RETURNING CHRISTIANITY TO WHAT IT ORIGINALLY WAS VOLUME 1 # 1

VERN BENDER

4 years ago

- www.vernbender.com

Every symmetry of physics laws leads to a conservation law, and every conservation law arises from a symmetry in the laws of physics.

Symmetry is the casual structure built into the creation module. The creation module has a two-way arrow of time built into it. All current information is always passed back into the versatile storage unit. These informational totals can’t be changed or deleted.
The closed sub-atomic quantum system is a duplicate of the macro quantum system. The two systems interact on a binary basis.

- THE LAW THAT CONTROLS ALL PARTICLE INTERACTIONS IS THIS:
- ALL THINGS ARE TRIUNE, WITH BINARY INTERACTIVES. THIS IS THE LINKAGE BETWEEN MATTER AND FORCE-CARRYING PARTICLES. THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE PARTICLE ZOO IS CONTROLLED BY FERMIONS AND BOSONS.
- THE REALITY OF HOW LIFE FORMS CAME ABOUT ON THIS REMOTE BLUE MARBLE IS THIS: THE EVENT ORIGINATOR WROTE THE CODE, PRODUCED THE BLUEPRINT, AND USED AN EVOLVEMENT PROCESS TO OBTAIN THE REQUISITE RESULT. IT’S ALL JUST A BINARY SOFTWARE PROGRAM.
- IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CODE THAT YOU START WITH.
- THE DESIGNER/CREATOR’S PROCESS : (recap).
- 1ST: Write the code for the upcoming big bang to create another universe. (One universe does not make an infinity.)
- 2nd: Write the code for the design and descent for all intended results as the event unfolds. ( One event does not require an eternity to make).
- 3rd: Set the event in motion. All things are triune, with binary interactives.
- 4th: Monitor, fine-tune, adjust, and select out ongoing.
- 5th: Use DESIGN AND DECENT as the process. Write a separately coded blueprint for the consciousness of the known thought reposers.
- 6th: It’s not the people; it’s the event.
- 7th: Harvesting new crops of known thought reposers was the intended result.
  - ONE EVENT DOES NOT MAKE AN ETERNITY.
  - EVOLUTION IS ONLY PART OF THE PROCESS.*
  - ALL THINGS ARE TRIUNE, WITH BINARY INTERACTIVES.
  - BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL IS ONLY GOOD.
  - IT’S NOT THE PEOPLE, ITS THE EVENT.
  - GET BACK TO WHERE YOU ONCE BELONGED.
  - IN THE END, CHOICES ARE NEVER FREE.
  - WHAT TO DO, IS UP TO YOU. ONE UNIVERSE DOES NOT MAKE AN INFINITY. GETTING BEYOND EVIL IS A START.
  - Darwinism is “sustained mostly by sociology.” Meaning, career pressures, groupthink, media hypnotism, and the like. So says biochemist Michael Behe, author of the new book A Mousetrap for Darwin: Michael J. Behe Answers His Critics, in a webinar conversation with Discovery Institute’s John West. The webinar was held over the past weekend, and you can see it now. The video recording of the event is quite entertaining, covering topics both weighty and whimsical — like Behe’s comparison of life, with its molecular machines, to The Borg from Star Trek. And what is the Lehigh University biochemist’s favorite Star Trek episode, anyway? Dr. Behe and Dr. West discuss the purpose of gathering Behe’s replies to the stronger and the weaker critiques of his earlier books. They take on a diverse range of live questions from viewers worldwide. Why this book and why now? The idea of the volume is not merely to dunk on the critics. Behe, to be frank, doesn’t find any of their criticisms very meaningful. Nor is it to shoot down what West calls the fake news-like “fake criticism” that Behe ignores challenges, as the reviewers of Behe’s recent book Darwin Devolves insinuated in a prominent article in the journal Science. West was surprised to realize how voluminous Behe’s record of answering critics is. He first thought he could fit the replies in a volume of just 300 pages or so. It turned out that Behe had more than 700 pages available to use. These were culled down at the end to 556 pages. Instead, A Mousetrap for Darwin demonstrates that “Darwinism is much more fragile” than many people realize, as Behe puts it here. That is the big takeaway. What’s assumed to be an unmovable, unbreakable monument to objective Science should, at this point, if we were all honest with ourselves, be steps away from shattering.
Distancing Darwin from Racism Is a Fool’s Errand.
The Darwinist position is: There is a difference on the average between blacks and whites in IQ tests. I would say the difference is genetic.
Historically, Darwin and his cohorts were just as racist and gender-biased as Cope or anyone else of their era. “Darwinism” is often invoked to provide scientific cover to policies both racist and plain monstrous. As I have pointed out, Darwin was undoubtedly as racist as the notorious species fixist Louis Agassiz. And Darwin’s Bulldog, Thomas Henry Huxley (1825-1895), was no better, arguing shortly after the American Civil War that blacks were doomed now that they were cut free from the purported protective influences of their owners. Huxley stated boldly that “no rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average negro is the equal, still less the superior, of the average white man.” One man did, the Darwinists’ arch-enemy—Richard Owen (1804-1892). As for women, Darwin was no champion of gender equality. As he stated in the Descent of Man, “Man is more courageous, pugnacious, and energetic than woman, and has a more inventive genius.” With their male counterparts having a brain that is “absolutely larger,”
Darwin doubted that women could surmount their biological limitations. Nevertheless, the social class could create, for Darwin, a state of general improvement for women. But according to Darwin, male selection mediated by social class made the difference. In Darwin’s day, most people assumed that acquired characteristics could be inherited. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck had taken this for granted in his theory of evolution, published more than fifty years before Darwin’s. The inheritance of acquired characteristics was often referred to as “Lamarckian inheritance.” Darwin shared this belief and cited many examples to support it. In this respect, Darwin was a Lamarckian, not so much because of Lamarck’s influence but because he and Lamarck both accepted the inheritance of acquired characteristics as a matter of common sense.
The taboo against the inheritance of acquired characteristics began to dissolve around the turn of the millennium. There is a growing recognition that some acquired characteristics can indeed be inherited. This kind of inheritance is now called “epigenetic inheritance.” In this context, “epigenetic” signifies “over and above genetics.” Some epigenetic inheritance depends on chemical attachments to genes, particularly of methyl groups. Genes can be “switched off” by the DNA’s methylation or the proteins that bind to it.
Did he [Darwin] see society, like nature, progress by culling its unfit members? “Social Darwinism” is often taken to be something extraneous, an ugly concretion added to the pure Darwinian corpus after the event, tarnishing Darwin’s image. But his notebooks make plain that competition, free trade, imperialism, racial extermination, and sexual inequality were written into the equation from the start — “Darwinism” was always intended to explain human society.

The word ‘eugenics’ was coined in 1883 by the English scientist Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, to promote the ideal of perfecting the human race by, as he put it, getting rid of its ‘undesirables’ while multiplying its ‘desirables.'” Essentially, humanity could give natural selection a hand by getting rid of those who (in the eyes of “desirables”) should fade away eventually anyway.
Eugenics is the philosophy and social movement that argues it is possible to improve the human race and society by encouraging reproduction by people or populations with “desirable” traits (termed “positive” eugenics) and discouraging reproduction by people with “undesirable” qualities (termed “negative” eugenics).
The Nazis embraced eugenics. As Smithsonian Magazine reported in 2018: “Nazi Germany’s ‘euthanasia program,’ which began approximately two years before the genocide of European Jews, targeted people with psychiatric, neurological or physical disabilities who were said to be a genetic and financial drain on the German state, and therefore ‘unworthy of life,’ according to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. It has been estimated that 200,000 adults and children were murdered in the name of this policy.”
Eugenics and its barbaric logic have been scientifically discredited, hopefully forever. Yet Darwinism continues to breed bigotry, less explicitly murderous but still deeply troubling.

www.vernbender.com www.vernbender.com

- - DNA is a codebook that issues instructions. DNA is the governing force that gives instructions to specific proteins at specific times and amounts.
  - DNA is an information structure. The gene blueprint regulates gene activity. DNA issues instructions three at a time. It maintains gene production and regulation to deliver the correct gene functions. Genes are networked in a complex sequenced network. The gene network self-schedules and provides the required results.
  - Information is physical, and it represents the ultimate nature of reality. These surprisingly simple assertions have many profound consequences. Information theory is the wellspring of our contemporary digital world. The universe is an information network. Life is an informational structure. Quantum gravity interacts with the universe’s knowledge base. This knowledge base stores the human consciousness bits. Growing and storing the knowledge bytes from the known thought reposer’s production is why this current universe exists. The universe’s information structure built the universe. The information structure then operates this universe. When the universe matures, the consciousness bytes generated by the known thought reposers are saved. They will be used again in the next universe.
- The triune combined functions of consciousness, quantum gravity, and quantum entanglement act as one from the underside of the fabric of space-time.
THE UNIVERSE GENERATES AND STORES ALL OF THE BITS OF CONSCIOUSNESS. IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BYTES.