Noncoding Junk DNA Is not Junk DNA, it brings the Genome to life.
VERN BENDER
PROMINENT SCIENTISTS PROCLAIM THAT RANDOMNESS IS ALL-KNOWING.
DARWINISM IS SETTLED SCIENCE; DON’T QUESTION US; WE COULDN’T POSSIBLY BE WRONG. ARE YOU STUPID, OR WHAT?
A 2021 article in Nature, “Non-coding deletions identify Maenli lncRNA as a limb-specific En1 regulator,” reports essential new functions for non-coding or “junk” DNA that underlie limb formation. Genes that code for proteins make up only about 2% of the human genome. Many researchers once dismissed the other 98% of the genome as “junk DNA.” Still, geneticists now know these noncoding regions help regulate the activity of the 20,000 or so protein-coding genes identified. Only about two percent of DNA is made up of protein-coding genes; the other ninety-eight percent is noncoding. Scientists once thought noncoding DNA was “junk” with no known purpose. However, it is becoming clear that at least some of it is integral to the function of cells, particularly the control of gene activity.
ANOTHER BITES THE DUST: A new study in Nature underscores just how vital noncoding DNA is for human development.
In the era of whole-genome sequencing, the findings underscore the need for a systematic annotation and functional characterization of lncRNA loci to interpret and classify non-coding genetic variants.
It has been concluded that genes spur an almost acrobatic rearrangement of the entire genome necessary for the organism to grow. Randomness knows some stuff.
JUNK DNA IS JUNK SCIENCE.
Evolutionary orthodoxy is junk science personified.
Over 130,000 functional genomic elements, previously called junk DNA have now been discovered, highlighting how important these “junk” segments are. It is now acknowledged that the majority of functional sequences in the human genome do not encode proteins. Elements such as long non-coding RNAs, promoters, enhancers, and countless gene-regulatory motifs work together to bring the genome to life. Variation in these regions does not alter proteins, but it can perturb the networks governing protein expression. There are thousands of research papers written on non-coding RNAs, which regulate gene expression.
RANDOMNESS CAN’T ACCOMPLISH THESE THINGS IN A TRILLION YEARS.
Today there are two major theoretical frameworks in biology. One is the ‘chemical paradigm,’ the idea that life is a highly complex chemistry form. The other is the ‘information paradigm,’ the view that life is not just ‘chemistry’ but ‘chemistry and information.
