- Key observations supporting the big bang theory include (1) expansion of the universe, (2) cosmic microwave background radiation, (3) abundances of the lightest chemical elements, and (4) age of the oldest-known stars.
- During the formation of the universe some 14 billion years ago in the so-called ‘Big Bang’, only the lightest elements were formed—hydrogen and helium along with trace amounts of lithium and beryllium
-
According to the Big Bang models, the universe at the beginning was very hot and very compact, and since then it has been expanding and cooling.
- Singularity. See also: Gravitational singularity, Initial singularity, and Planck units § Cosmology. …
- Inflation and baryogenesis. …
- Cooling
- Structure formation.
- Cosmic acceleration.
- These three observations are (1) the expansion of the universe as measured by the redshift of light emitted from galaxies (2) the existence of the cosmic background radiation and (3) the relative amounts of hydrogen, helium and deuterium in the universe.J
-
Four Elements: Four Developmental Stages in the Big Bang Cosmology
The Four Cosmological EpochsTHE BIG BANG THEORY VS. THE NO BIG BANG THEORY HAS TO BE RESOLVED.- Planck Epoch, Inflationary Epoch, Particle Epoch, Matter Dominated Epoch.
- The JWST did not disprove the Big Bang. You just misunderstood what it did discover.
- What specific discoveries made by the JWST have led to a reevaluation of the Big Bang theory? How do scientists determine the validity of a scientific theory over time? What are some examples of new information that has changed scientific theories in the past?
-
- Key points about criticisms of the Big Bang theory:
- BIG BANG THEORY FLAWs
- Light elements: lithium and helium…
- Antimatter annihilation…
- Surface Brightness…
- Too Large Structures…
- Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB) and its Anisotropies. …
- Dark Matter.
- A significant criticism of the Big Bang theory is that it appears to violate the first law of thermodynamics by suggesting the universe originated from “nothing,” essentially creating matter and energy where there was none.While the Big Bang theory is the prevailing model for the universe’s origin and evolution, it faces some theoretical and observational challenges, including questions about the singularity, the nature of dark energy and matter, and the formation of large-scale structures.
- The main problem with the theory of the Big Bang is that it is entirely based upon the equations of classical general relativity, which indicates a singularity at the origin of cosmic time; this infinite energy density is impossible to achieve in physics.
- The JWST did nothing of the sort. And you don’t know what a theory is in science. It doesn’t mean guessing. It doesn’t mean, “I think this happened.” It doesn’t mean many guys got together and decided this was the answer. No. A theory, in science, is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world and universe that can be repeatedly tested and corroborated by the scientific method using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results.
- Besides, the term “Big Bang” was never the name of the theory. Its actual name is the “Lambda-CDM Model.” The term “Big Bang” was created by Fred Hoyle, who mocked it. “So what happened? It was a big bang or something? Hur, hur, hur.” He favored the steady state model, which stated that the universe had always existed and that matter and energy were continually created through something like a white hole. This, of course, violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, making the universe an open system.
- Do you know who first came up with the idea? This man:
- G noticed that things were moving away from us, and the farther away they were, the faster they moved away. And that meant that, at some point, everything was closer together. Go back far enough, and it’s all in one space.
- The scientific minds at that time dismissed this idea as being, and you’ll love this, too close to creationism. That’s right; a priest is credited with introducing the Big Bang, but scientists dismissed it as not scientific. But like all good scientists, they looked at the evidence, did their research, and admitted he was right.
- It wasn’t an explosion but a rapid expansion of spacetime. What caused it? We don’t know, and that’s fine. That means we have something more to learn.
- As for the JWST “disproving” the Big Bang? No, it hasn’t. All it’s done is show that part of our understanding is wrong. That doesn’t invalidate it. It just means we need to reevaluate it. Unlike religion, which is dogmatic and static, science changes when new information comes to the fore. Tim Minchin said it best in his beat poem “Storm”:
- Science adjusts its views based on what’s observed.
- Faith is the denial of observation so that belief can be preserved.
- If you show me that
- Say homeopathy works, then I will change my mind.
- I’ll spin on a fucking dime.
- I’ll be embarrassed, but I will run through the streets yelling.
- It’s a miracle! Take physics and bin it!
- Water has memory!
- And whilst its memory of a long-lost drop of onion juice seems infinite,
- The JWST did nothing of the sort. And you don’t know what a theory is in science. It doesn’t mean guessing. It doesn’t mean, “I think this happened.” It doesn’t mean many guys got together and decided this was the answer. No. A theory, in science, is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world and universe that can be repeatedly tested and corroborated by the scientific method using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results.
-
#image_title
- Besides, the term “Big Bang” was never the name of the theory. Its actual name is the “Lambda-CDM Model.” The term “Big Bang” was created by Fred Hoyle, who mocked it. “So what happened? It was a big bang or something? Hur, hur, hur.” He favored the steady state model, which stated that the universe had always existed and that matter and energy were continually created through something like a white hole. This, of course, violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, making the universe an open system.
- Do you know who first came up with the idea? This man:
- G noticed that things were moving away from us, and the farther away they were, the faster they moved away. And that meant that, at some point, everything was closer together. Go back far enough, and it’s all in one space.
- The scientific minds at that time dismissed this idea as being, and you’ll love this too, too close to creationism. That’s right; a priest is credited with introducing the Big Bang, but scientists dismissed it as not scientific. But like all good scientists, they looked at the evidence, did their research, and admitted he was right.
- It wasn’t an explosion but a rapid expansion of spacetime. What caused it? We don’t know, and that’s fine. That means we have something more to learn.
- As for the JWST “disproving” the Big Bang? No, it hasn’t. All it’s done is show that part of our understanding is wrong. That doesn’t invalidate it. It just means we need to reevaluate it. Unlike religion, which is dogmatic and static, science changes when new information comes to the fore. Tim Minchin said it best in his beat poem “Storm”:
- Science adjusts its views based on what’s observed.
- Faith is the denial of observation so that belief can be preserved.
- If you show me that
- Say homeopathy works, then I will change my mind.
- I’ll spin on a fucking dime.
- I’ll be embarrassed, but I will run through the streets yelling.
- It’s a miracle! Take physics and bin it!
- Water has memory!
- And whilst its memory of a long-lost drop of onion juice seems infinite,
- It somehow forgets all the poo it’s had in it!
- You show me that it works and how it works.
- And when I’ve recovered from the shock
- I will take a compass and carve ‘Fancy That’ on the side of my cock.
- The JWST did not disprove the Big Bang. You just misunderstood what it did discover.
- What specific discoveries made by the JWST have led to a reevaluation of the Big Bang theory? How do scientists determine the validity of a scientific theory over time? What are some examples of new information that has changed scientific theories in the past?
- I will take a compass and carve ‘Fancy That’ on the side of my cock.
- The JWST did not disprove the Big Bang. You just misunderstood what it did discover.
- What specific discoveries made by the JWST have led to a reevaluation of the Big Bang theory? How do scientists determine the validity of a scientific theory over time? What are some examples of new information that has changed scientific theories in the past?
-
#image_title
#image_title
